Deep integration with Microsoft Planner
Imagine this: you create a task in MSProject that requires action from a task owner. You click the Link to Planner button and go through the linking process (https://blogs.msdn.microsoft.com/brismith/2017/08/29/microsoft-planner-linking-plans-to-a-project-task/#comment-48795). But instead of just being a link to the Planner plan, you actually see the task as a card on the plan, with Task Name, Start Date, Finish Date, and Resources all being pulled from MSProject to Planner. And you can add more tasks from MSProject to Planner, each as its own card. You then add this plan to a tab on Teams, and people can go from the plan to the document they're tasked to work on and back to the plan to mark their task complete, which then pushes back to MSProject as a completed task.
Wouldn't that be awesome?!
We hear you – thanks for the feedback. Please keep sharing your scenarios and your asks here. We want to make sure we have a great experience between Project and Planner.
If we could have Planner, as it exists today with a few added features, it would be a great addition.
Must Have Features:
* Planner card has a Two way sync with a MS Project task. Each side is updated if the other side is changed (eg: dates, notes, attachments, people assigned, etc...)
* Ability to enter critical work hours in Planner Card per resource (hours completed by day, hours remaining in task), which would be very welcome feature for people to use Planner to input their hours (progress) vs. having to jump to TIMESHEET as well. The key is getting Project resources to do all their work in Planner (easy to use, lightweight), and all this would roll up into our Resource Planning/Power BI Reports.
That would really be great if we can link 1 planner by project and that we can find in the planner alle the tasks of the project.
The update, creation,... of tasks would be possible from both side (planner or project).
If we have more than 1 project in our project online, then that would be possible to find alle this project in planner hub.
Seriously? 1 planner plan: 1 project task doesn't make any sense. I'm trying to think of a use case but I'm struggling.
Steffen Reister commented
To the previous post I'd like to add also:
- a 1:1 ProjectTask: Planner Bucket
Why not giving the possibility to users to choose the level of sync they want/need?
For example having a parameter that will allow users to decide the level of sync:
- either 1:1 planner task:project task
- or 1:1 planner plan:project task
- and why not 1:1 planner plan:project plan
I can imagine this would be a complete different work to accomplish, but it would allow anyone to choose how they decide to work
Introduce 1:1 planner task to project task and I'll sign the company up, currently looking for a solution to assist with resource planning of staff involved with multiple Planner plans. If Project could give a consolidated view of all plans and tasks then it would solve the problem without having to go to third party resource.
maybe a middle way would be a perfect way
let's maybe (optionally) connect a project task to an planner plan buket ?
1:1 planner task:project task scenario would be much much better!
It would be giving a flexibility to have team oriented Planner plans (Planner is team oriented!) for more than one MS Project (Project is product oriented) or even give a -freedom- to organize splitting of planner plans
In case of working with programms where multiple projects are served witha limited pool of resouces (people) 1 planner plan: 1 project task scenario ends with an unusable amount of planner plans that can't be managed by a human
1:1 planner task:project task is so obvious in the meaning of terms!
How do you will speak / explain the difference between project task and planner task?
Some contras for 1 planner plan: 1 project task scenario:
- it excludes a possible benefits of rescheduling for planner tasks using the Project engine
- it exludes a freedom of organizing planner planns - the only possible strure of planner planns will be the one that is imposed by project; this is in a fundamental conflict with planner organisation. Planner plans are team oriended
Please just publish a 1:1 card to task sync (and backwards, with time tracking and subtasking).
Anything else can be published later on...
It's really annoying having all those different plans and projects, loosing track of all of them...
This seems SO OBVIOUS, please let me send project tasks to a planner card, 1:1 card to task sync. I have 5 PMs and 100's of task workers in the org, Planner is so simple and Project is so complicated. This would fix all my task update/completion problems...
This would be great, we have a customer who is very interested in this as a part of the cloud platform. There are third party tools that offer it, looking forward to seeing what the Microsoft Team comes up with!
Agree with other supporters that the 1 project task: 1 planner card sync is a much more valuable use case than the 1 project task: 1 planner board.
Jeremy Prestidge commented
100% need a 1:1 card to task sync
I would like to see 1 task to 1 Planner Card sync. It would be great to be able to have the % complete show in the Project schedule. Team members could use Planner and the PM can sync in the Planner tasks needed for their schedule.
I'm going to agree with a lot of people here... I think what we want to see is the "Sync" mentioned. That Planner tasks sync up with MS Project tasks, but Planner provides a more "lightweight" user interface. I would also like to see bidirectionality... i.e. If you update % complete in Planner it pushes that status to Project and PWA and vice versa.
I would love to see a synchronized task environment too. Where tasks can be pushed from Project/PWA to Planner and even to Outlook. As well as back up the chain...
The 1 Planner to 1 task is not very useful. Right now in Project I can create a custom field and put in the hyperlink to a planner plan and accomplish the same functionality. I guess a slight improvement could be that every resource in that planner plan shows up against the task and that the overall status of the plan would reflect in the project task. Anyway, IMHO the 1 Planner Task to 1 Project Task is what would be useful. Thank you : )
Trutz-Sebastian Stephani commented
I can see an additional value with the 1 task : 1 planner card sync: This would directly go to Outlook in the same manner as the new ToDo sync. Then you could tick of tasks either in Outlook or Planner and you would have something that the Work Management feature in SharePoint 2013 tried to provide: all tasks in one place. Of course, this might prove problematic when you want to do timesheeting
The 1 planner plan : 1 project task scenario doesn't make sense and I can't think of a practical use case. The 1:1 sync is the only way to go; ideally POL would be an interface primarily for project managers while all resources could use Planner to monitor their work and sign offs.
The project sites are another issue.. I don't need multiple sites for each project. I agree the post below suggesting each project gets a teams site.
Steffen Reister commented
Planner should be the work managment Tool below Project Schedules, what at the end means that a Project Task/ Summary Task should be synched with detail Info from a Planner plan, like earliest start and latest end, progress - and what ever is wanted by the Project Manager. So make it somehow configurable which information from Planner should be synched to the linked Project Task into which Field (could be be a Custom Field also). We may have also custom Fields in Planner in the future!?
I agree with Trutz but want to add that a link should be managed in Project Client or in POL - should be up to the user where he prefers to work!