How can we improve Project?

Deep integration with Microsoft Planner

Imagine this: you create a task in MSProject that requires action from a task owner. You click the Link to Planner button and go through the linking process (https://blogs.msdn.microsoft.com/brismith/2017/08/29/microsoft-planner-linking-plans-to-a-project-task/#comment-48795). But instead of just being a link to the Planner plan, you actually see the task as a card on the plan, with Task Name, Start Date, Finish Date, and Resources all being pulled from MSProject to Planner. And you can add more tasks from MSProject to Planner, each as its own card. You then add this plan to a tab on Teams, and people can go from the plan to the document they're tasked to work on and back to the plan to mark their task complete, which then pushes back to MSProject as a completed task.

Wouldn't that be awesome?!

274 votes
Sign in
Check!
(thinking…)
Reset
or sign in with
  • facebook
  • google
    Password icon
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Joe shared this idea  ·   ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    48 comments

    Sign in
    Check!
    (thinking…)
    Reset
    or sign in with
    • facebook
    • google
      Password icon
      Signed in as (Sign out)
      Submitting...
      • Anonymous commented  ·   ·  Flag as inappropriate

        As a PM who runs large programmes and detailed Project Plans / Work Packages I agree with the need for Project Task to Planner Task (and bucket) integration and bi-directional sync, the current "link one task to a planner plan" is nonsense. I would prefer to see the mapping to a planner plan done at work package level.

      • Yaron S commented  ·   ·  Flag as inappropriate

        Hi,
        Really cool feature,
        We using in our company in MS Project online and I road that have option to integrate with Planner feature,
        I did the steps according write in the site, but the tasks not integrate to Planner system .
        I opened ticket to Microsoft, and representative tell me in the conversation that the feature did'nt release yet (have only the infrastructure)
        it's correct ?.

      • BryanV commented  ·   ·  Flag as inappropriate

        I was so excited about this feature. Couldn't wait for planner to be released to GCC. I was shocked to find out that I can't link a task in project to a task in planner, but I have to link a task in project to a project in planner. Doesn't make any sense to me. I'll probably not use Project then and just use planner.

      • JohnH commented  ·   ·  Flag as inappropriate

        If we could have Planner, as it exists today with a few added features, it would be a great addition.

        Must Have Features:

        * Planner card has a Two way sync with a MS Project task. Each side is updated if the other side is changed (eg: dates, notes, attachments, people assigned, etc...)

        * Ability to enter critical work hours in Planner Card per resource (hours completed by day, hours remaining in task), which would be very welcome feature for people to use Planner to input their hours (progress) vs. having to jump to TIMESHEET as well. The key is getting Project resources to do all their work in Planner (easy to use, lightweight), and all this would roll up into our Resource Planning/Power BI Reports.

      • Vincent commented  ·   ·  Flag as inappropriate

        That would really be great if we can link 1 planner by project and that we can find in the planner alle the tasks of the project.
        The update, creation,... of tasks would be possible from both side (planner or project).

        If we have more than 1 project in our project online, then that would be possible to find alle this project in planner hub.

      • dave commented  ·   ·  Flag as inappropriate

        Seriously? 1 planner plan: 1 project task doesn't make any sense. I'm trying to think of a use case but I'm struggling.

      • Anonymous commented  ·   ·  Flag as inappropriate

        Why not giving the possibility to users to choose the level of sync they want/need?
        For example having a parameter that will allow users to decide the level of sync:

        - either 1:1 planner task:project task
        - or 1:1 planner plan:project task
        - and why not 1:1 planner plan:project plan

        I can imagine this would be a complete different work to accomplish, but it would allow anyone to choose how they decide to work

      • Anonymous commented  ·   ·  Flag as inappropriate

        Introduce 1:1 planner task to project task and I'll sign the company up, currently looking for a solution to assist with resource planning of staff involved with multiple Planner plans. If Project could give a consolidated view of all plans and tasks then it would solve the problem without having to go to third party resource.

      • Jack commented  ·   ·  Flag as inappropriate

        or
        maybe a middle way would be a perfect way

        let's maybe (optionally) connect a project task to an planner plan buket ?

      • Jack commented  ·   ·  Flag as inappropriate

        1:1 planner task:project task scenario would be much much better!

        It would be giving a flexibility to have team oriented Planner plans (Planner is team oriented!) for more than one MS Project (Project is product oriented) or even give a -freedom- to organize splitting of planner plans

        In case of working with programms where multiple projects are served witha limited pool of resouces (people) 1 planner plan: 1 project task scenario ends with an unusable amount of planner plans that can't be managed by a human

        1:1 planner task:project task is so obvious in the meaning of terms!
        How do you will speak / explain the difference between project task and planner task?

        Some contras for 1 planner plan: 1 project task scenario:
        - it excludes a possible benefits of rescheduling for planner tasks using the Project engine
        - it exludes a freedom of organizing planner planns - the only possible strure of planner planns will be the one that is imposed by project; this is in a fundamental conflict with planner organisation. Planner plans are team oriended

      • Anonymous commented  ·   ·  Flag as inappropriate

        Please just publish a 1:1 card to task sync (and backwards, with time tracking and subtasking).
        Anything else can be published later on...
        It's really annoying having all those different plans and projects, loosing track of all of them...

      • Anonymous commented  ·   ·  Flag as inappropriate

        This seems SO OBVIOUS, please let me send project tasks to a planner card, 1:1 card to task sync. I have 5 PMs and 100's of task workers in the org, Planner is so simple and Project is so complicated. This would fix all my task update/completion problems...

      • Haley commented  ·   ·  Flag as inappropriate

        This would be great, we have a customer who is very interested in this as a part of the cloud platform. There are third party tools that offer it, looking forward to seeing what the Microsoft Team comes up with!

      • Joe commented  ·   ·  Flag as inappropriate

        Agree with other supporters that the 1 project task: 1 planner card sync is a much more valuable use case than the 1 project task: 1 planner board.

      • Anonymous commented  ·   ·  Flag as inappropriate

        I would like to see 1 task to 1 Planner Card sync. It would be great to be able to have the % complete show in the Project schedule. Team members could use Planner and the PM can sync in the Planner tasks needed for their schedule.

      ← Previous 1 3

      Feedback and Knowledge Base